SwiftPeer

Demo

About

1. Lack of Transparency and Trust in Review Process - Solution: SwiftPeer ensures a transparent and trustless review process, promoting confidence in the evaluation of research papers. 2. Potential Biases in Acceptance Process - Solution: The decentralized architecture of SwiftPeer reduces biases, fostering an inclusive and impartial assessment of research contributions. 3. Inefficiency and Delay in Review Procedures - Solution: Through smart contract implementation and automation, SwiftPeer accelerates the review and acceptance procedures, leading to quicker decision-making and reduced administrative burdens. 4. Limited Access to Research Papers - Solution: SwiftPeer ensures free and open-source access to research papers on the public blockchain, allowing for perpetual availability and the creation of connected graphs. 5. Risk of Premature Leaks and Lack of Confidentiality - Solution: Researchers can upload files in encrypted form using SwiftPeer, preventing premature leaks and ensuring the confidentiality of their work. 6. Inadequate Record-Keeping - Solution: SwiftPeer employs NFT-based record-keeping, assigning a unique NFT to each submission and approval for transparent and immutable documentation. 7. Inefficient Payment Processes - Solution: SwiftPeer streamlines payment processes for hassle-free verification, enhancing overall efficiency in the academic and research ecosystem. **Links** - [https://github.com/codewizard26/eth-f](https://github.com/codewizard26/eth-f)

How it's made

- Lighthouse - Challenge: Incomplete documentation, the platform needs to integrate features such as retrieving Content Identifiers (CIDs). - Solution: Developed and implemented smart contracts to address the missing functionality and retrieve necessary CIDs. -Scrolls - Challenge: Problem with getting the test faucet for the scroll sepolia - Solution : Bridged the sepolia eth to get scroll sepolia