Search projects, hackathons, sponsors and tech

    ← All projects

    Demo

    About

    The problem it solves Most online Q&A platforms suffer from: • Low-quality answers — little incentive to contribute thoughtful responses. • No skin in the game — answers cost nothing, so spam and shallow takes flood the feed. • Unfair recognition — the best ideas often get buried under noise or popularity bias. Stoa fixes this by: • Requiring players to pay to answer, filtering out low-effort responses. • Using AI adjudication to fairly judge the best answers. • Distributing token rewards to winners, making knowledge directly valuable. What you can use it for • In the classroom to incentivize participation • Running high-signal Q&A rounds for communities, DAOs, and creators. • Turning ordinary discourse into a game with rewards and fairness baked in. Smart Contract Address(es) Factory https://basescan.org/address/0x56Ee1dAb5b0CB673D25C4893FBE8253b08112658 Example question https://basescan.org/address/0x1ed5a0ef3d37422fc709b1b27b9a7738680a5064

    How it's made

    Challenges we ran into One of the biggest hurdles was coordinating onchain and offchain timing. Ending a question requires an onchain transaction and a database update, which led to race conditions when multiple users tried to end it at the same time. The workaround was to make question endings purely user-driven with an onchain lock, so only the first transaction succeeds and others revert. AI judging needed to be trustable. Letting anyone finalize results wasn’t safe, so we moved to a whitelist of judges (AI agents + approved accounts) to ensure fairness while still keeping it decentralized over time.